| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2021 | Volume
: 10
| Issue : 2 | Page : 86-91 |
|
|
Predictive value of the glasgow coma scale, age, and arterial blood pressure and the new trauma score indicators to determine the hospital mortality of multiple trauma patients
Rahimeh Khajoei1, Mohammadreza Zeid Abadi1, Tania Dehesh1, Nabiollah Heydarpour2, Sajad Shokohian2, Farzad Rahmani3
1 Department of Medical Emergencies, Sirjan School of Medical Sciences, Sirjan, Iran
2 Prehospital Medical Emergency Organization, Sirjan School of Medical Sciences, Sirjan, Iran
3 Road Traffic Injury Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Correspondence Address:
Prof. Farzad Rahmani
Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medicine Department, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Golgasht Street, Azadi Avenue, Tabriz
Iran
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
DOI: 10.4103/atr.atr_72_20
|
|
|
Background: Authoritative trauma scoring systems can quickly assess the damage and show its severity plus prognosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive value of the new Glasgow Coma Scale, age, and systolic blood pressure (GAP) and the new trauma score (NTS) indicators to determine the mortality of trauma patients in hospitals in Sirjan in 2019. Materials and Methods: In a descriptive-analytical study, 2570 patients with multitrauma caused by traffic accidents transferred by the prehospital emergency were enrolled in the study. Demographic variables of patients as well as GAP and NTSs were collected and calculated, with the outcome of patients followed up and recorded during hospitalization. The predictive value of these scores was determined in clarifying the outcome of patients using SPSS software. Results: Of the total number of patients studied, 14 (0.5%) patients died during hospitalization. The mean GAP and NTS scores in dead patients were 12.78 ± 6.92 and 11.64 ± 7.36, respectively. Furthermore, in surviving patients, they were 22.19 ± 1.12 and 22.30 ± 1.22, respectively, with a P < 0.05 in each case. Based on the above tools with 95% confidence level, the area under the curve for the mortality was 0.932 for the GAP system and 0.944 for the NTS (P > 0.001). Conclusions: Both indicators could predict the mortality of patients with multitrauma. It could also be used to determine the priority of dispatch at the scene of the accident and the triage of the injured (people). Based on the results of the receiver operating characteristic curve, the NTS score has a higher accuracy.
|
|
|
|
| [FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|
